[tor-relays] Tor Relay on ARM server Marvell Armada 370/XP

niftybunny abuse at to-surf-and-protect.net
Tue Dec 20 17:19:06 UTC 2016


Yes, running 12 exits there.

https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/28F4F392F8F19E3FBDE09616D9DB8143A1E2DDD3 <https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/28F4F392F8F19E3FBDE09616D9DB8143A1E2DDD3>

the atom cpu suxx, install 2 instance, so you get around 100-120 mbit. 

Markus


> On 20 Dec 2016, at 14:40, Volker Mink <volker.mink at gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> Is it OK with their TOS to run a TOR Relay7Exit?
> If so, i really consider getting a VPS there!
>  
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2016 um 14:24 Uhr
> Von: "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists" <lists at infosecurity.ch>
> An: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> Betreff: [tor-relays] Tor Relay on ARM server Marvell Armada 370/XP
> Hello,
> 
> i'm experimenting Tor setup on very cheap servers from scaleaway.com
> that run a quad-core ARM Marvell Armada 370/XP servers but have
> unlimited bandwidth.
> 
> Those are Soc platform:
> http://natisbad.org/NAS2/refs/Marvell_ARMADA_370_SoC.pdf <http://natisbad.org/NAS2/refs/Marvell_ARMADA_370_SoC.pdf>
> 
> I saw no information on torproject mailing list about those SOC.
> 
> I'm trying to push the limits and i saw that those have a crypto
> acceleration support:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/marvell-cesa.txt <https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/marvell-cesa.txt>
> 
> However with kernel 4.5.7 it does not really work and loading of
> marvel-cesa gives out error:
> [6.841862] marvell-cesa: probe of d0090000.crypto failed with error -22
> 
> :(
> 
> 
> I've only built latest Tor 0.2.9 with -O9 -mcpu=marvell-pj4
> -mtune=xscale and the Tor Relay is at
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/82C63C5D61D17557B7C5D0E7FDC545A2B6B6B7E0 <https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/82C63C5D61D17557B7C5D0E7FDC545A2B6B6B7E0>
> .
> 
> Does someone have experienced optimizing and tuning Tor specifically on
> ARM processors to understand how far those could be optimized?
> 
> -naif
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>_______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20161220/f7f15bda/attachment.html>


More information about the tor-relays mailing list