[tor-relays] Second relay on same ESX

[balbea16]

Hi Tim,TNX for your fast response. That was more or less what I thought already. Mike

-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: teor <teor2345 at gmail.com> 
Datum: 12.12.16  07:28  (GMT+01:00) 
An: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org 
Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Second relay on same ESX 


> On 12 Dec. 2016, at 17:08, balbea16 <balbea16 at gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi 
> Are you actually talking about identical relays, i.e. with the same fingerprint? That would be interessting for me, as I'd like to run a second Rasp Pi in parallel for redundency reasons.
> Mike

Please don't run a second relay on the same fingerprint.
Your relay won't get much traffic, because it will look like
its address and ports are changing all the time.

Instead, run two relays with different keys, and let the
network load-balance between them.

Tim

> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
> Von: Patrick DERWAEL <patrick at derwael.be> 
> Datum: 12.12.16 06:41 (GMT+01:00) 
> An: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org 
> Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Second relay on same ESX 
> 
> John,
> The host has 32GB RAM& 4 CPUs
> I have allocated 2GB & 2CPUs to my VM
> As the VM CPU usage is +/-40%, I'm not sure if I should reduce to 1CPU (would it then be used at 80% average?)
> 
> P.
> 
> 2016-12-11 18:22 GMT+01:00 John Ricketts <john at quintex.com>:
> Patrick,
> 
> I run all of my relays under VMware  and I don't have any issues at all.
> 
> How many CPUs do you have in the physical server and how many virtual CPUs do you have assigned to the VM?
> 
> John
> 
> On Dec 11, 2016, at 11:19, Patrick DERWAEL <patrick at derwael.be> wrote:
> 
>> Hi guys,
>> 
>> I'm running a relay in a VM on a physical server which is largely under used
>> Current advertised bandwidth 26MB, consensus 76500
>> I'm considering running a second relay (2nd VM) on the very same hardware, but this brings a few questions:
>> 
>> - is there any issue running it at the same geographical place?
>> - would the current total BW effectively consumed (26MB) be divided in 2 (i.e. no added value in BW)?
>> - basically, would it have any significant added value to the network?
>> 
>> Thanks
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Patrick Derwael
> Rue de la fontaine, 3
> 4210 Burdinne
> G:0479.80.50.79
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

T

-- 
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
------------------------------------------------------------------------



_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20161212/174dcc95/attachment.html>