[tor-relays] Does Setting Up a Bridge Relay Disable the Browser?

[Billy Humphreys]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Well, people suggest that, unless you give <100KB/s, you should run a
relay, not a bridge, as more relays are used (and we have Tor weather
and such). You should be using Tor's daemon (apt-get install tor
tor-arm) for the relay or bridge itself.
- -Poke

On 07/09/2015 07:11, Kenneth Freeman wrote:
> This may be a naïve question, but I've fired up my 64-bit Debian
> box now that the nights are cool, and editing the torrc to
> establish a bridge relay borks the browser. I provide anonymity
> much more than I use it myself, but is the bridge relay copacetic?
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing
> list tor-relays at lists.torproject.org 
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=gkNr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x6DEF6C26.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20150907/8dab28eb/attachment.key>