[tor-relays] Decision on Dedicated Server for Exit Node

[Niklas Kielblock]

Hello,

I can't say much about BalticServers in general, but their AS currently 
houses nine relays, two of which are exits (search 
compass.torproject.org for AS59642).
You're increasing diversity as long as you're not adding to the upper 
half of networks, so I think that should be fine.

niklas

On 22/11/2014 00:28, Libertas wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I've been looking for a budget dedicated server to host an exit node
> on, and the best option I've found is BalticServers. However, they're
> already listed on the GoodBadISPs wiki page, and because they're in
> Northeast Europe (Lithuania, to be precise) I'm concerned that their
> ISP already has more exit nodes than is healthy for network diversity.
>
> Is it a good idea to host another exit node there? If you think
> there's a better option, I'd appreciate it if you could tell me either
> publicly or privately.
>
> Thanks,
> Libertas
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUb8qfAAoJELxHvGCsI27Nx0sP/j5wBhV7EJZZ4EJoPgnoEH8A
> i6cDB3sL+Q50MgZivZLG47U+wdj95EJeIRl16RsaL0JaShVwyvbpStaIuhpOoujX
> FN0oumg3Z27fists+CSImLAHHHyr3a526XbWQazKZ7ReBvBZeIOa4PKA/OWsI8wg
> CWogwEWxbVNMojWaHMID3Y43qEeSH/T0R9ibqyrvqoZrOhnVqH1+1HzVs4FAWoST
> UMS2m/+b1qL4riL20XyaS0SUO0OkNbL3ecBnCN9LZJwMMuXVB4QNrsBSNFtDTpeu
> r8ZPJ/DxLJuQOtOvluSqqriKZCCi2lFAHovcXAf2ele0xqPrnJLFXDvhKkuAlv2o
> wQb+hdpBZ95u073cu/md8vTYVzA8NJ/sRTPmsWtxdRR8PMVpx59+BOAWNYMLWgEu
> JdTVinsbaWuKKTCtsZY0KAmYRbYC8E0O46z3OnOaeLX2s4MLUK/rPV3FoOAJ0tA3
> ixnJ0kjuaFiBN7SRn+N4imBEmt5DP3cbPmai6YX5FzaL0RjlD+1uWk/ZxV66iK3c
> YrisgQ0bWFbVCGeztblvBGQF3o6cElCJ26Cvy3EaTn7No+1d4f+/1rYwYCmNHjYY
> mdfUhSfWWFNv+oaF9MU/IHek45l+yrTHHZlhrk3pmFX/bcUWWcfcYX1D/aMhgH58
> 7p48+5liXZOtSuVK44aS
> =/fUH
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>