[tor-relays] Irony and inconsistency

[Fabiano London]

Please! I am not participate in this forum anymore! Any e mail that coming after this will be reported to Uk intelligence police (M15) 
Be aware pls with all posts or e mails here !
Have a nice weekend to all  

> On 12 Jan 2014, at 18:30, Richard Budd <rotorbudd at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Same thing here.
> I had a server from day one with them and was told "Sorry you've been with us from the start.
> But after careful consideration, Crissic Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR on the Crissic network."
> 
> 
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Steve Snyder <swsnyder at snydernet.net> wrote:
>>> On 01/03/2014 05:46 PM, I wrote:
>>> In this morning's messages -
>>> 
>>> One about three relays paid for a year in advance.
>>> 
>>> “Something Solutions LLC has decided to ban the usage of TOR.“ despite “We DO Allow Tor Relays"  being in their current AUP.
>> [snip]
>> 
>> I see no need to be so solicitous of the vendor's reputation.  It is Crissic Solutions ( http://crissic.net/ ) that has changed its policy.
>> 
>> When I asked the reason for the policy change I was told "Few different reasons, primarily network related."  My take is that they didn't like their users actually using all the bandwidth that they paid for.
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20140118/c73180b0/attachment.html>