[tor-relays] Too little traffic on my #2 non-exit relay

[Christian Dietrich]

Yep,weird. I've installed both at the same time, on an clean ubuntu 
out-of-the box system
at 2013-09-11. As you can see at atlas.torproject.org #1 has been 
started at 2013-09-11 08:40:17
and #2 at 2013-09-11 08:40:17.

@Mick: This will be solved at next restart, but i don't think the 
problem is caused by missing nodefamily.

Thanks,
Chris
> Weird that #1 has the stable flag and #2 don't then.
> "Stable" -- A router is 'Stable' if it is active, and either its
> Weighted MTBF is at least the median for known active routers or its
> Weighted MTBF corresponds to at least 7 days."
> The above suggests that #1 has been known to the dirauths for a while
> (since it got stable) and #2 either restarts a lot or has not been
> around for long.
>
> On 2013-09-18 20:41, Christian Dietrich wrote:
>> Thanks, but both relays have been started at the same time.
>> Due to the fact that they also have the same configuration,
>> both should offer up to 1 gigabit/s bandwidth.
>>
>> "RelayBandwidthRate 125 MBytes
>> RelayBandwidthBurst 125 MBytes"
>>
>> Both relays are exactly the same, except for the IPv4 adress.
>>
>>> Your #2 relay is only advertising 83.96 KB/s so it's no surprise it gets
>>> low traffic.
>>> Can it be that #1 is an old relay and #2 is relatively new? If #2 is new
>>> it needs time to ramp up traffic:
>>> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay
>>>
>>> On 2013-09-18 18:57, Christian Dietrich wrote:
>>>> Hey there,
>>>>
>>>> I'm currently running two tor (non-exit) relays on one host machine.
>>>> "000000000000myTOR1" and "000000000000myTOR2".
>>>> Now my problem is that tor relay #2 generates almost no traffic.
>>>>
>>>> https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/000000000000myTOR
>>>>
>>>> Log Relay #1:
>>>> Circuit handshake stats since last time: 1566234/14743525 TAP,
>>>> 10428/10433 NTor.
>>>> Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 7 days 6:00 hours, with 56008 circuits
>>>> open. I've sent 2167.46 GB and received 1567.97 GB.
>>>>
>>>> Log Relay #2:
>>>> Circuit handshake stats since last time: 63/63 TAP, 1/1 NTor.
>>>> Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 7 days 6:00 hours, with 4 circuits open.
>>>> I've sent 1.58 GB and received 844.66 MB.
>>>>
>>>> Both have the same binary and configuration (except incoming/outgoing
>>>> IPv4). I've also tried to switch from
>>>> "fully self compiled debian, with custom kernel, and own tor binary"
>>>> to "Out of the Box Ubuntu LTS, with torproject tor package"
>>>> .. without any improvement. Both relays works as expected.
>>>>
>>>> OT: for my opinion avg 150 mbit/s (99% done by node #1) is too less
>>>> for an Ivy-Bridge Based Xeon Quad Core (/w HT) on an unshared gigabit
>>>> line.
>>>> Apart from the fact that multithread support is really missing.
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone give me a hint, or am i just too stupid? Thanks ;)
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20130918/c17c9845/attachment.html>