[tor-relays] Relay - Conflicting data (Atlas != log)
Mark Jamsek
mark at bsdbox.co
Tue Dec 3 00:08:48 UTC 2013
I am trying to run a restricted exit relay on FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE in a
jail. I tested it out a couple days ago on an old(er) box, and
everything worked fine:
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A5CA10E554124289C1B42B4CCA68F0CACFE503DC
Decided to get it running on a fresher rig, all appears well according
to system data:
$ tail notices.log
Dec 02 15:49:31.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 90%: Establishing a Tor circuit.
Dec 02 15:49:34.000 [notice] Tor has successfully opened a circuit.
Looks like client functionality is working.
Dec 02 15:49:34.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 100%: Done.
Dec 02 15:49:34.000 [notice] Now checking whether ORPort
110.146.133.98:9001 and DirPort 110.146.133.98:9030 are
reachable... (this may take up to 20 minutes --
look for log messages indicating success)
Dec 02 15:49:40.000 [notice] Self-testing indicates your ORPort is
reachable from the outside. Excellent. Publishing server
descriptor.
Dec 02 15:49:59.000 [notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done.
Dec 02 15:50:33.000 [notice] Self-testing indicates your DirPort is
reachable from the outside. Excellent.
Dec 02 15:50:33.000 [notice] Not advertising DirPort (Reason:
AccountingMax enabled)
Dec 02 15:51:50.000 [notice] Your DNS provider gave an answer for
"rmus4fklislhf", which is not supposed to exist.
Apparently they are hijacking DNS failures. Trying to correct for this.
We've noticed 1 possibly bad address so far.
Dec 02 21:49:39.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 6:00 hours, with
0 circuits open. I've sent 946 kB and received 7.09 MB.
$ ps -aux |grep tor
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND
torrelay 86844 0.0 12.1 60532 52796 ?? IJ 3:49PM 0:33.50 tor
--RunAsDaemon 1
Apart from the DNS hijacking entry(?), Tor is apparently up and running.
However, according to Atlas, it is not:
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/EE16D7A4FBCF6494FEE75C856D76782295CB9DC4
(forgot to backup tor key; hence, the different print)
Not sure what to think or do. Is it advertised on Atlas as false due to
this entry: [notice] Not advertising DirPort (Reason: AccountingMax enabled)
Or is one of the two sources (system or Atlas) wrongly reporting? Thank you.
--
01101101 01100001 01110010 01101011
More information about the tor-relays
mailing list