[tor-relays] new relays

[tor at t-3.net]

This thread did go goofy and bad (and off-topic, given the subject in 
the emails). It seems clear that there are important reasons Tor could 
never begin examining/taking direct responsibility for/filtering the 
content that flows through it (as opposed with disallowing specific 
ports, which is different). Asking for this seems naive.




On Saturday 31/08/2013 at 8:54 am, Steve Snyder  wrote:
>
>
> On 08/30/2013 08:05 PM, Andrea Shepard wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> If I were going to work on filtering by technical means, it'd be 
>> filters to
>> keep neo-Puritans like you out of my life, thanks.
>
> Well said.  This whole thread is example 87653478965432 of the
> "censorship is A-OK if I don't like it" mindset.
>
> Maybe we need a competitor to Tor, a privacy network that only allows
> pictures of cute kittens and puppies as traffic.
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20130831/400b1325/attachment.html>