[tor-relays] BitTorrent complaint
bartels
bartels at mailme.ath.cx
Thu Apr 11 20:17:42 UTC 2013
On 04/11/2013 08:56 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> On 11.04.2013 11:56, bartels wrote:
>>> >> I totally agree. That's why our relays allow every port except 25. But,
>>> >> in the event that DMCA complaints scare away the ISP (or the exit
>>> >> operator), they should go for the reduced exit policy (and look for a
>>> >> better ISP), instead of randomly dropping packets or otherwise filtering
>>> >> traffic, which is just mean (and probably illegal).
>> > Illegal? Why would it be illegal? Or mean?
> Mean: Tor specifically has the exit policy to be able to select an exit
> that allows that outgoing connection. If an exit relay then drops that
> connection silently, Tor (and the user) cannot know it needs to select a
> different exit. The connections simply fail. That is totally mean.
>
Okay, I get your point. By the way, I am not arguing, just trying to understand.
Rejecting via Exit Policy is fine; disturbing the network concept is not necessary.
I don't see the legal issue, though. Maybe it is there, but I don't see how rejecting sites via Exit Policy ;) would trigger any one of (1)
through (5).
- bartels
More information about the tor-relays
mailing list