[tor-relays] Status of NumCPUs >2 in 0.2.3.x?
Nick Mathewson
nickm at freehaven.net
Mon Nov 5 02:57:48 UTC 2012
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Steve Snyder <swsnyder at snydernet.net> wrote:
> In the Tor v0.2.2.x series it was said that it was pointless to set
> NumCPUs to a value greater than 2. Due to poor scaling, I guess.
>
> Is that still the case with v0.2.3.24+ ? Would NumCPUs value of 4 or 8
> (on systems with that many CPU cores) actually provide any benefit over a
> value of 2?
>
It might help circuit start-up latency a little, but other crypto still
isn't parallelized, so it won't help a ton. I'd like to have that happen
in 0.2.4, but there are a lot of other features I want for 0.2.4 too, so
we'll have to see whether it gets done in time. (The feature I want MOST
for 0.2.4 is "comes out on schedule.")
yrs,
--
Nick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20121104/946f2201/attachment.html>
More information about the tor-relays
mailing list