[tor-relays] Call for discussion: turning funding into more exit relays
kupo at damnfbi.tk
kupo at damnfbi.tk
Thu Jul 26 12:37:35 UTC 2012
Just throwing my 2 cents in, we're running loki
<http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=088adab38da02bd83286872120f85259d44ded88>
on a decade old dell pe1950 p3 (32bit) w/ 2GB of ram. We average about
5.2 Mbps of traffic. That said I'm looking forward to seeing what
increases a 64 cpu would bring.
-kupo
On 07/26/2012 07:28 AM, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:48:16PM -0700, Sriakhil Gogineni wrote:
>> Ball park quotes we got were 99$ / 100 Mbps or $599 / 1000 Mbps for transit
>> for a single 1U... we'll see if we can get something better...
> That's a good quote for 1Gbps.
>
>> Would this be helpful / viable option for a Tor exit node ?
> Yes.
>
>> I also had just one question: what are the specs required for a Tor node?
>> It does not seem too resource intensive but I have not been able to find
>> any minimum system requirements. Would a current / last-generation quad
>> core with 8GB + would suffice?
> A quad-core Xeon X3350 at 2.66 GHz can easily push 500 Mbps of Tor
> throughput (500 Mbps up, 500 Mbps down). CPU is a fairly limiting
> factor. Having AES-NI is a benefit. 8GB RAM is reasonable; there's no
> reason to have more, but less is a tight squeeze.
>
> -andy
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20120726/8f85b0d8/attachment.html>
More information about the tor-relays
mailing list