[tor-relays] weighting algorithm

[Flamsmark]

On 2 March 2011 07:37, Karsten Loesing <karsten.loesing at gmx.net> wrote:

> We lost 2 of our 4 bandwidth scanners between Saturday at 18:00 UTC and
> Tuesday at 14:00 UTC.  We need at least 3 scanner results for clients to
> use the measured bandwidth values instead of the self-reported ones.


Have you considered adding more bandwidth scanners? Is the quorum of 3/4
designed to prevent a pair of scanners from being evil, or to ensure that
representative sample is used?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20110312/fb0dacd4/attachment.htm>