init.d script for multi instance TOR servers
Mike Perry
mikeperry at fscked.org
Tue Sep 7 08:41:54 UTC 2010
Thus spake Jim (Jimmymac at copper.net):
> Olaf Selke wrote:
> >On 06.09.2010 19:25, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> >>On 06.09.2010 18:07, Olaf Selke wrote:
> >>>depending on your tcp timeout parameters you need a lot of local ports.
> >>>Did you verify the number of Tor tcp sessions isn't limited by
> >>>net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range?
> >>Yes.
> >
> >I'm clueless. Do you want me to shut down all four blutmagie exits for a
> >couple of days and wait if other exits get more traffic?
>
> If the idea is to run some experiments, I have a proposal that perhaps
> would have less adverse impact on the Tor network -- and hoperfully
> still yield useful data ...
>
> I believe torservers (Moritz's nodes) are runnning slighly less than 3/4
> of what he believes their capacity should be. And I think he is
> running four instances of roughtly equal capacity. What if Moritz -- as
> an experiment -- converted one of his four nodes to a non-exit node.
> If his total traffic is roughly unchanged from what it is now, then I
> believe that would indicate (relative) excess exit capacity is not the
> problem. If his total traffic increases significantly, then perhaps
> further investigation is warranted. Is that worth a try?
The way to do this is to just spin up additional nodes. I believe
Moritz has tried this, and so has Jake. AFAIK, it did help Jake hit
1Gbit for Guard+Middle traffic. I'm not sure on Moritz's results,
though.
--
Mike Perry
Mad Computer Scientist
fscked.org evil labs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20100907/daa42017/attachment.pgp>
More information about the tor-relays
mailing list