[tor-project] Arranging new default obfs4 bridges

[teor]

> On 9 Mar 2017, at 22:24, David Fifield <david at bamsoftware.com> wrote:
> 
> In November 2016 there was a discussion on the tor-team list about
> adding some new default obfs4 bridges (Subject: Coordinating to run high
> capacity obfs4 bridges). The thread turned into a discussion about the
> same entity running both bridges and exits, and didn't go anywhere.
> 
> We haven't added any new obfs4 bridges, or changed the port number of
> any existing bridges, since January 2017 (Tor Browser 6.5 and 7.0a1). I
> suspect that the 20 existing default bridges are still under high load
> and we could stand to have some more bridges to help share it. Are we
> still interested in adding new obfs4 bridges? If so, do we have any
> leads on who could run them?

Hi Mart, Sacha,

Would GreenHost be interested in running some of the default Tor Browser
obfs4 bridges?

If so, please reply to this thread.

(GreenHost already runs the default Tor bridge authority, but since the
default Tor Browser bridges don't use the bridge authority, I can't see
any technical or trust issues here.)

T

--
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
------------------------------------------------------------------------



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/attachments/20170313/dc952435/attachment.sig>