[tor-project] Arranging new default obfs4 bridges

[teor]

> On 9 Mar 2017, at 22:24, David Fifield <david at bamsoftware.com> wrote:
> 
> In November 2016 there was a discussion on the tor-team list about
> adding some new default obfs4 bridges (Subject: Coordinating to run high
> capacity obfs4 bridges). The thread turned into a discussion about the
> same entity running both bridges and exits, and didn't go anywhere.
> 
> We haven't added any new obfs4 bridges, or changed the port number of
> any existing bridges, since January 2017 (Tor Browser 6.5 and 7.0a1). I
> suspect that the 20 existing default bridges are still under high load
> and we could stand to have some more bridges to help share it. Are we
> still interested in adding new obfs4 bridges? If so, do we have any
> leads on who could run them?

Team Cymru and Mozilla recently asked how they could help out.
(Cymru hosts a directory authority, I don't know whether either run
exits.)

John Ricketts volunteered, but he runs (about 6% of) exits.

T

--
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
------------------------------------------------------------------------



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/attachments/20170309/026ca6fe/attachment.sig>