[tor-project] The Tor Project Social Contract

[teor]

> On 2 Aug 2016, at 10:51, Alison <macrina at riseup.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mike, I think that this is valid criticism. I'd really like it if we
> could at least clarify that we will always make most of our tools free
> of cost. I've added that line to your revision:

Can I suggest:

"We will make most of our tools free of cost."

I'm not sure if the "always" adds anything.

Tim

> 
> Mike Perry:
>> Here's an attempt to reword to capture my thinking:
>> 
>>  3. Our tools are universally available to access, use, adapt, and distribute
>> 
>>  The more diverse our users, the less simply being a user of Tor implies
>>  about any user, so we aim to create tools that anyone can access and
>>  use. We will always make most of our tools free of cost. We do not restrict access to our tools unless it is for the
>>  security of all users, and we design, build, and deploy our tools
>>  without collecting identifiable information about our users. We expect
>>  the code and research we publish to be improved by many different
>>  people, and that is only possible if everyone has the ability to use,
>>  copy, modify, and redistribute our tools.
> _______________________________________________
> tor-project mailing list
> tor-project at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmmp: teor at torproject dot org





-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/attachments/20160802/20dbb59f/attachment.sig>