[tor-onions] Renaming Rendezvous Single Onion Services

[Tim Wilson-Brown - teor]

> On 25 Feb 2016, at 16:10, Ann O'Nymous <ann.onymous at vfemail.net> wrote:
> 
>> We discussed requiring a separate build for Single Onion Services, and
>> initially rejected it in favour of a long option name containing "NonAnonymous".
> 
> Why did you reject separate builds? The use case for Single-Onion
> Services is very different from traditional Double-Onion Services. And
> potential consequences for accidentally using Single-Onion Services are
> huge. Accidents happen. Stupidity happens. Perhaps someone is learning
> and testing, and then goes to production with the wrong torrc. Or they
> hire someone to code, and there is miscommunication. I agree with Fabio.
> Requiring a custom build with a --very-hard-to-ignore-warning flag is
> far stronger protection.

We initially decided it wasn't necessary.
But now it seems like a good way to address Nick's concerns.
I'll talk to him about it when I see him over the next few days.

Tim

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP 968F094B

teor at blah dot im
OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-onions/attachments/20160225/7a48453a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-onions/attachments/20160225/7a48453a/attachment.sig>