[tor-dev] Proposal 301: Don't include package fingerprints in consensus documents

[Iain Learmonth]

Hi,

>> On 25/02/2019 23:30, teor wrote:
>>> Looks good to me, let's merge it as an "accepted" proposal?

This is now proposal 301.

What is the process by which this becomes "accepted"? Is this just a
matter of someone making that commit?

Thanks,
Iain.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20190313/42fdbba5/attachment.sig>