[tor-dev] Dealing with critical sbws tickets
teor
teor at riseup.net
Mon Jun 3 22:48:16 UTC 2019
Hi juga,
I read your meeting notes from this week's network team meeting:
juga(offline):
Week of 05/20 (planned)
- Add Tor version to the bandwidth file (#30196)
Week of 05/20 (actual)
Week of 06/03 (plan)
- Continue with #30406: Refactor header constants in sbws to
use Stem's one
For the next few weeks, can you focus on fixing critical sbws bugs,
and helping with authority deployments?
Here's what I think we could do:
I would like us to deploy sbws to 3/6 bandwidth authorities some time
in June. We can do this deployment as soon as another directory
authority operator is ready.
To deploy more than 3 sbws instances, we need to fix these critical sbws
bugs:
We need sbws to generate bandwidth lines for all relays with results,
even if they are not Running in the sbws tor client's current consensus.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29710#comment:13
We need sbws to use MaxAdvertisedBandwidth from the latest descriptors:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30733
We also need to look for any more critical bugs in sbws. Here are some
ways we can check for bugs:
We need to check if all sbws instances exclude some relays, to help us find
any more bugs in sbws:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30735
90% of sbws measurement attempts fail. But these are internal errors, not
network errors. So it looks like sbws has a relay selection bug:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30719#comment:2
After we do these tasks, we can deploy sbws to 4 bandwidth authorities.
What do you think?
T
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20190604/52f6899a/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the tor-dev
mailing list