[tor-dev] Dealing with critical sbws tickets

teor teor at riseup.net
Mon Jun 3 22:48:16 UTC 2019


Hi juga,

I read your meeting notes from this week's network team meeting:

juga(offline):
   Week of 05/20 (planned)
      - Add Tor version to the bandwidth file (#30196)
   Week of 05/20 (actual)
   Week of 06/03 (plan)
      - Continue with #30406: Refactor header constants in sbws to
use Stem's one

For the next few weeks, can you focus on fixing critical sbws bugs,
and helping with authority deployments?

Here's what I think we could do:

I would like us to deploy sbws to 3/6 bandwidth authorities some time
in June. We can do this deployment as soon as another directory
authority operator is ready.

To deploy more than 3 sbws instances, we need to fix these critical sbws
bugs:

We need sbws to generate bandwidth lines for all relays with results,
even if they are not Running in the sbws tor client's current consensus.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29710#comment:13

We need sbws to use MaxAdvertisedBandwidth from the latest descriptors:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30733

We also need to look for any more critical bugs in sbws. Here are some
ways we can check for bugs:

We need to check if all sbws instances exclude some relays, to help us find
any more bugs in sbws:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30735

90% of sbws measurement attempts fail. But these are internal errors, not
network errors. So it looks like sbws has a relay selection bug:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30719#comment:2

After we do these tasks, we can deploy sbws to 4 bandwidth authorities.

What do you think?

T

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20190604/52f6899a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the tor-dev mailing list