[tor-dev] A ContactInfo specification

[teor]

On 21 Oct 2017, at 19:21, nusenu <nusenu-lists at riseup.net> wrote:

>> Automated statistics would be more reliable for these particular use cases.
>> If the information is sensitive, it can be collected using a safe aggregation
>> scheme (PrivCount as described in prop280, or similar).
> 
> I agree that it would be desirable to not require manual steps (=error
> prone and likely outdated over time) for items that can be automated.
> 
> Most fields on the current list can not be automated though.
> 
> Do you consider the following torrc _settings_ too sensitive to publish
> by relays (without an aggregation scheme)?
> 
> - OfflineMasterKey setting (0/1)
> - SigningKeyLifetime
> - Sandbox (0/1)

Yes, these are directly related to relay security, so if they can be linked
to the relay, they should be opt-in.

> - Schedulers

I don't think this is sensitive information.

T