[tor-dev] Proposal 284: Hidden Service v3 Control Port
Damian Johnson
atagar at torproject.org
Tue Nov 7 17:40:36 UTC 2017
> What do you propose exactly?
Hi David. What I mean is that having an optional positional field...
MyEvent Field1 Field2 [Field3] Key1=Value1
... means we cannot ever add more positional fields in the future. For
example...
MyEvent Field1 Field2 [Field3] [Field4] Key1=Value1
... would be ambiguous if the third field is Field3 or Field4 since
they're both optional. We also could not add new mandatory positional
fields...
MyEvent Field1 Field2 Field4 [Field3] Key1=Value1
... because it would be ambiguous if the third field was Field4 with a
new version of tor or Field3 with an old one.
> I can't really change the "DescriptorID" to a
> key=value format. So, you think I should just not extend that field and use a
> new "key=value" for it?
Why not? Does the DescriptorID have equal signs in it? If so then you
could also make this be a mandatory positional field with a filler
value like 'none' if unavailable.
Cheers! -Damian
More information about the tor-dev
mailing list