[tor-dev] Pluggable Transports 2.0 Specification, Draft 2

[teor]

> On 21 Jun 2017, at 16:20, Yawning Angel <yawning at schwanenlied.me> wrote:
> 
> The "2.0" spec still doesn't have any provisions for using AF_LOCAL
> instead of the loopback interface, go figure.  It's not as if I bring
> it up every time this topic comes up or anything right?

Th exact types of addr and port are not specified, so application
could pass:
unix:/var/run/tor/obfsocket
And still remain within the spec.

But to make this usage clear, I suggest we change:
<addr:port>
To:
<addr>[:<port>]
And define addr as either an IPv4, IPv6, hostname, file path, or some
other address understood by the application / proxy.

If we don't want to do that, please at least change it to:
<addr>:<port>

T

--
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
------------------------------------------------------------------------



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20170621/6749c687/attachment.sig>