[tor-dev] Doesn't hidden services break RFC 3986?

[Alec Muffett]

Also: just because it's HTTP/S running over a different network stack,
doesn't make it a new scheme.

Just because your dinner arrives on a different plate doesn't mean the
recipe has changed. :-)

On 14 Aug 2017 8:53 am, "Andreas Krey" <a.krey at gmx.de> wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 17:06:20 +0000, Ryan Carboni wrote:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3
> > By placing the scheme within the authority as a tld while using the same
> > authority as the HTTP specification, this probably breaks RFC 3986 and
> > maybe others.
>
> RFC7686 deals with that.
>
> Andreas
>
> --
> "Totally trivial. Famous last words."
> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800
> _______________________________________________
> tor-dev mailing list
> tor-dev at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20170814/55e3d67b/attachment.html>