[tor-dev] Proposal: Tor with collective signatures

[Tim Wilson-Brown - teor]

> On 30 Apr 2016, at 01:13, Tom Ritter <tom at ritter.vg> wrote:
> 
>> 3.4 Optional: Break-the-glass Emergency Directory Adjustments
>> ...
>> With even fancier crypto, even the witnesses would not
>> necessarily need
>>    to know, but that’s beyond the scope of this proposal and its
>> desirability may
>>    be questionable at any rate.
> 
> I love me some fancy crypto, but I question the need for this feature
> at all, let alone more complex versions of it.

This looks like a "golden key" from a distance, and, if there's a bug in the implementation, it could well become one.

I'd want to make sure we really needed this feature before implementing it.

Tim

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP 968F094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20160430/eb90f9a4/attachment.sig>