[tor-dev] Bridge Guards (prop#188) & Bridge ORPort Reachability Tests

[Tim Wilson-Brown - teor]

> On 12 Sep 2015, at 17:26, isis <isis at torproject.org> wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> However, for "double onion services" — or whatever we're calling the thing that
> is (historical) hidden services 2.0 — your point is a good one; I'm starting to
> realise more and more that defences for "double onion services"¹ are possibly
> defences for bridges and vice versa.
> 
> ...
> 
> ¹ Sorry, but — after having to type that twice — that name sucks.

“double onion services” - I see what you mean.

What about “dual onion services”?
Or even “dual onion”?

It’s shorter, and means the same thing.

I’ll stop bikeshedding now.

Tim

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP: 968F094B (ABFED1AC & A39A9058 expire 15 Sep 2015)

teor at blah dot im
OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F (From 1 Sep 2015)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20150914/18eefc3d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20150914/18eefc3d/attachment.sig>