[tor-dev] Onion Services and NAT Punching

[Alec Muffett]

> On Oct 1, 2015, at 06:15, Andreas Krey <a.krey at gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>> Are there any use cases that:
>> * need NAT punching,
>> * don't need service location anonymity, and
>> * would benefit from lower latency?
> 
> Of course. All the cases where you set up a hidden service
> exactly because your host is behing a NAT.
> Like the webcam raspi I'm just booting up.

And like us.  We run our tor daemons in a enclave network which can only connect outbound to the Internet, or backwards into infrastructure.

    -a

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20151026/03ca0101/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20151026/03ca0101/attachment-0001.sig>