[tor-dev] Draft of proposal "Direct Onion Services: Fast-but-not-hidden services"

[Alec Muffett]

On Apr 10, 2015, at 1:58 PM, George Kadianakis <desnacked at riseup.net> wrote:
"Jacob H. Haven" <jacob at jhaven.me> writes:
> […deletia...]

Hi All,

I’m actually drafting a diff regards the sorts of thing where you’re discussing nomenclature; but I am new to the Tor codebase and would love having someone (and, perhaps, and IRC forum?) with whom/where I could chat/ask about which-bits-do-what?

Work in progress at http://pastebin.com/Pza1uyfm <http://pastebin.com/Pza1uyfm> - but this is all scratch, very incomplete, and predates this discussion.

I am working from the position that a “direct” onion (for the moment I’ve been using the work “brazen” - opposing “hidden” - but “direct” is more attractively mundane) does not need triple-hop circuits for everything.  I am starting to get a handle on which code sets up the outbound links to the IP and RP, but I would really love to bounce some ideas off folks who have more experience of the code.

    -a

—
Alec Muffett
Security Infrastructure
Facebook Engineering
London

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20150410/523ab119/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20150410/523ab119/attachment.sig>