[tor-dev] Feedback on recent Globe improvements

[Christian]

On 30.03.2014 12:44, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> 
> moving our private discussion to the public mailing list.
> 
> 
> You were asking about making graphs from Onionoo's new clients
> documents.  Here's an example:
> 
> "1_week":{"first":"2014-03-23 12:00:00","last":"2014-03-30
> 12:00:00","interval":86400,"factor":0.002802803,"count":8,"values":[251,933,471,955,999,999,735,713],"countries":{"cn":0.1882,"dz":0.0728,"es":0.0146,"fr":0.1006,"gb":0.0174,"hk":0.0233,"ir":0.1119,"jp":0.1882,"kz":0.0117,"my":0.1532,"us":0.1123},"versions":{"v4":1.0000}},
> 
> For this bridge, you'd draw the first data point at x = 2014-03-23
> 12:00:00 UTC with y = 251 * 0.002802803 = 0,703503553 concurrent users.
> 

Thanks,
I added client graphs to canary/index-11349.html .

> 
> You were also asking about feedback on new uptime graphs:
> 
> http://rndm.de/globe/canary/index-11349.html
> 
> Looks pretty good!  The uptime graphs for the relays I checked were not
> as exciting as the bandwidth graphs, but it's actually good if uptime is
> always at 100%.
> 
> 
> And finally, you asked about showing numeric averages next to graphs,
> like on:
> 
> https://status.github.com/graphs/past_week
> 
> I like the idea.  I think we shouldn't split up graphs to have only 1
> line per graph, because that makes it hard to compare incoming and
> outgoing traffic or the various weights to each other.  But it could
> help to have numeric averages in the same color as graph lines next to
> the graphs.
> 

Do you think, that we should place all graphs above eachother?
With more than two graphs it's harder to compare them if they're
positioned in a grid like fashion.

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> All the best,
> Karsten
>