[tor-dev] [tor-commits] [flashproxy/master] remove failed connections from proxy_pairs as well
David Fifield
david at bamsoftware.com
Mon Mar 10 17:02:15 UTC 2014
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 02:39:18PM +0000, infinity0 at torproject.org wrote:
> commit 05b9c101ba9afe4653d1eff6f5414f90f22ef042
> Author: Ximin Luo <infinity0 at torproject.org>
> Date: Fri Mar 7 13:39:31 2014 +0000
>
> remove failed connections from proxy_pairs as well
> - this is a pretty major fix, as the previous behaviour effectively disabled a proxy after 5 failed connections (= max_num_proxy_pairs / 2)
Can you say some more about the circumstances of this fix? What behavior
changed for you after making it? I can't reproduce what's described in
the commit message.
With 9dea0c6c90dedc868dfaa84add2bfa19a2039281, I set up a phony
facilitator with
ncat -v -lk 7000 --sh-exec "./facilitator.py"
where facilitator.py has the contents
#!/usr/bin/env python
import random
import sys
port = random.randint(10000,11000)
print "HTTP/1.0 200 OK\r"
print "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\r"
print "Cache-Control: no-cache\r"
print "Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *\r"
print "\r"
sys.stdout.write("check-back-in=10&client=127.0.0.1:"+str(port)+"&relay=173.255.221.44:9901")
I then browse to
file:///home/david/flashproxy/proxy/embed.html?debug&facilitator=http://127.0.0.1:7000&initial_facilitator_poll_interval=1&unsafe_logging&max_clients=2
All the "client" connections are going to closed ports, but the "Client:
error" lines still appear and clients don't accumulate in the request
URL. The same happens if I use an open port with a Ncat listener that
just closes the connection. The same happens if I change to a
non-listening Internet address like 1.1.1.1.
2014-03-10T16:28:48.173Z | Starting; will contact facilitator in 1 seconds.
2014-03-10T16:28:49.179Z | Facilitator: connecting to http://127.0.0.1:7000?r=1&transport=websocket.
2014-03-10T16:28:49.203Z | Next check in 10 seconds.
2014-03-10T16:28:49.204Z | Facilitator: got client:{ host: "127.0.0.1", port: 10782 } relay:{ host: "173.255.221.44", port: 9901 }.
2014-03-10T16:28:49.205Z | 127.0.0.1:10782|173.255.221.44:9901 : Client: connecting.
2014-03-10T16:28:49.206Z | 127.0.0.1:10782|173.255.221.44:9901 : Client: connecting.
2014-03-10T16:28:49.207Z | 127.0.0.1:10782|173.255.221.44:9901 : Client: error.
2014-03-10T16:28:49.208Z | 127.0.0.1:10782|173.255.221.44:9901 : Client: closed.
2014-03-10T16:28:49.209Z | Complete.
2014-03-10T16:28:49.209Z | 127.0.0.1:10782|173.255.221.44:9901 : Client: error.
2014-03-10T16:28:49.209Z | 127.0.0.1:10782|173.255.221.44:9901 : Client: closed.
2014-03-10T16:28:49.210Z | Complete.
2014-03-10T16:28:59.205Z | Facilitator: connecting to http://127.0.0.1:7000?r=1&transport=websocket.
2014-03-10T16:28:59.226Z | Next check in 10 seconds.
2014-03-10T16:28:59.227Z | Facilitator: got client:{ host: "127.0.0.1", port: 10221 } relay:{ host: "173.255.221.44", port: 9901 }.
2014-03-10T16:28:59.227Z | 127.0.0.1:10221|173.255.221.44:9901 : Client: connecting.
2014-03-10T16:28:59.227Z | 127.0.0.1:10221|173.255.221.44:9901 : Client: connecting.
2014-03-10T16:28:59.229Z | 127.0.0.1:10221|173.255.221.44:9901 : Client: error.
2014-03-10T16:28:59.229Z | 127.0.0.1:10221|173.255.221.44:9901 : Client: closed.
2014-03-10T16:28:59.230Z | Complete.
2014-03-10T16:28:59.230Z | 127.0.0.1:10221|173.255.221.44:9901 : Client: error.
2014-03-10T16:28:59.230Z | 127.0.0.1:10221|173.255.221.44:9901 : Client: closed.
2014-03-10T16:28:59.231Z | Complete.
2014-03-10T16:29:09.227Z | Facilitator: connecting to http://127.0.0.1:7000?r=1&transport=websocket.
2014-03-10T16:29:09.249Z | Next check in 10 seconds.
2014-03-10T16:29:09.250Z | Facilitator: got client:{ host: "127.0.0.1", port: 10069 } relay:{ host: "173.255.221.44", port: 9901 }.
Now what *does* seem to be happening, and what had me confused for a
while, is that Firefox seems to be artificially delaying repeated
WebSocket connections to the same port with some kind of exponential
delay. I originally had a hardcoded port in facilitator.py, and the
delay made it appear that something like what the commit message
describes was happening. Since WebSocket connections eventually start
waiting a long time to fail, it looks like they are not being closed.
https://people.torproject.org/~dcf/graphs/firefox-exponential-delay.png
is a screenshot showing what looks like exponential growth in the
Network panel. Chromium doesn't appear to have the same issue; the
requests are linearly spaced in the network pane.
Are you able to confirm any of the above? When you discovered the bug,
were you testing with Firefox or Chromium? How did you find the bug, and
what did you do (differently from the above) to reproduce it? In any
case, what's going on must be different than what's described in the
commit message, because even before the fix the proxy continues running
for me with max_clients=2.
David
More information about the tor-dev
mailing list