[tor-dev] Revised Relay Descriptor Fields proposal

[isis]

Damian Johnson transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> This is for extrainfo descriptors, not server descriptors. Do bridges
> publish extrainfo descriptors?

Oh. That wasn't clear to me from the proposal, but I must have simply
missed it.

Yes, bridges do publish extrainfo descriptors. BridgeDB parses those
as well, for now only to look for the `transport` lines.

> >  1. Why 5KB?
> >
> > Are we planning on allowing people to use Tor's consensus to pass
> > encrypted emails around? 
> >
> >> Should there be an upper bound for individual keys, values, or key/value
> >> pairs?
> 
> This is something Virgil and I disagree about. I wanted a maximum line
> length and count, while he likes the net 5kb threshold. I'll let him
> explain his reasoning.

Encrypted emails... :)

-- 
 ♥Ⓐ isis agora lovecruft
_________________________________________________________
GPG: 4096R/A3ADB67A2CDB8B35
Current Keys: https://blog.patternsinthevoid.net/isis.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1154 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20140714/33b82033/attachment.sig>