[tor-dev] Pluggable transport weekly meeting

[Lunar]

Ximin Luo:
> I assume people will be interested in creating Debian packages for
> these too. I am wondering if we should adopt a naming convention like
> tor-pt-sshproxy, tor-pt-flashproxy, tor-pt-obfsproxy etc - like how
> mozilla extensions are all called xul-ext-*. (We could even start a
> working group too.)
> 
> ATM this would involve renaming obfsproxy, but I am about to package
> flashproxy, and thinking about what to name the package.

I have heard people making the argument that obfsproxy, at least, was
not specific to Tor and could perfectly be used with plain SSH. The
prefix “tor-pt-” would not really be appropriate then.

-- 
Lunar                                             <lunar at torproject.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20130908/b244cd85/attachment.sig>