[tor-dev] R: Re: questions about extending circuit

[Sean Robinson]

 Hi,

  I see both Ravi and Damian have contributed fixes to extend_circuit in
the last few days, including better examples.  Please try your test with
the latest version in the repository <https://gitweb.torproject.org/stem.git>.
Let us know whether this works for you.

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:21 PM, succer110 at tiscali.it
<succer110 at tiscali.it>wrote:

> Hi
> From your code,  does not seems possible to create new circuits specifying
> fingerprint.
>
> https://stem.readthedocs.org/en/latest/_modules/stem/control.html#Controller.extend_circuit
>
> Also i don't think it's possibile to extendcircuits with fingerprint from
> command line with control port... i've tried but i failed.
> This sounds very strange to me: it should be possibile to create circuits
> with the 500 "unnamed" router constantly connected!
> Where Am I wrong?
> Thankyou
>
> ----Messaggio originale----
> Da: atagar at torproject.org
> Data: 30/11/2012 2.21
> A: <tor-dev at lists.torproject.org>
> Ogg: Re: [tor-dev] questions about extending circuit
>
> Hi. Both HackerSpaceSeoul and HackerspaceSeoul lack the named flag,
> which likely is why tor isn't allowing you to refer to it by the
> nickname. Have you tried referring to it by the fingerprint instead?
>
> Speaking of which, TorCtl is being deprecated in favor of a couple
> newer controller libraries...
>
> https://stem.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ - replacement with a similar
> design to TorCtl, see the tutorial for usage
> https://txtorcon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ - twisted controller library
>
> If you try using stem then let me know if run into any issues or have
> questions! -Damian
>
>

-- 
Sean Robinson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20121207/6055c3a3/attachment.html>