[tor-dev] Next ten Tor Tech Reports

[Karsten Loesing]

On 8/9/12 8:29 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 8/8/12 8:13 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
>> Since HotPETS doesn't count as "publishing" perhaps this should be
>> listed as a tech report:
>> http://fscked.org/talks/TorFlow-HotPETS-final.pdf
> 
> [...]
>
> How about we put the LaTeX sources in tech-reports.git, change them to
> use the new tech report template, assign a report number, and add a
> footnote saying "This report was presented at 2nd Hot Topics in Privacy
> Enhancing Technologies (HotPETs 2009), Seattle, WA, USA, August 2009."?
> Then people can decide if they rather want to cite our tech report or
> the HotPETs one.
> 
> Happy to do or help with the conversion if you tell me where your
> sources are.

So, what do you think?  Still happy to help. :)

Thanks,
Karsten