[tor-dev] Proposal 185: Directory caches without DirPort
Karsten Loesing
karsten.loesing at gmx.net
Thu Sep 22 08:49:04 UTC 2011
Hi Nick,
and here are a few comments to your proposal 185:
On 9/20/11 9:34 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Configuration:
>
> Add a new torrc option, "DirCache". Its values can be "0", "1",
> and "auto". If it is 0, we never act as a directory cache, even
> if DirPort is set.
Do these relays set "dir-cache 0" in their router descriptors? Or do
they just not include "dir-cache 1"? But if they set a non-zero
DirPort, how will the directory authorities and clients know that the
node doesn't want to act as a directory cache?
> If it is 1, then we act as a directory cache
> according to same rules as those used for nodes that set a
> DirPort. If it is "auto", then Tor decides whether to act as a
> directory cache.
What are the rules when setting a DirPort? Successful self-test and
minimum advertised bandwidth? How's "1" different from "auto" if Tor
decides whether to act as a directory cache in both cases?
> Consensus:
>
> Authorities should assign a "DirCache" flag to all nodes running
> as a directory cache that do not set a DirPort.
Would it make sense to have them assign the "DirCache" flag for nodes
with a non-zero DirPort, too?
Best,
Karsten
More information about the tor-dev
mailing list