Proposal: remove down routers from consensus

[Geoffrey Goodell]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:58:05PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Geoffrey Goodell wrote:
> 
> > Suggest that instead of removing routers that are not running, we simply
> > remove routers for which we do not have descriptors in dir/server/all.
> > Does this make sense?
> 
> No, what good would that do?  The goal here is to make the consensus
> document smaller.

This would make the consensus document smaller -- I am not sure why the
consensus document includes routers that are not in dir/server/all, but
last I checked it did.  This fact bothers me more than the fact that
some of the routers are not Running.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20080612/245efac1/attachment.pgp>