141: exit policy summary
Peter Palfrader
peter at palfrader.org
Thu Aug 14 12:39:57 UTC 2008
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 01:00:53AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > >
> > > > An exit policy summary will be included in votes and consensus as a
> > > > new line attached to each exit node. A lack of policy should indicate
> > > > a non-exit policy. The line will have the format
> > > > "p" <space> "accept"|"reject" <portlist>
> > > > where portlist is a comma seperated list of single port numbers or
> > > > portranges (e.g. "22,80-88,1024-6000,6667"). Whether the summary
> > > > shows the list of accepted ports or the list of rejected ports depends
> > > > on which list is shorter (has less elements). In case of ties we
> > > s/less elements/a shorter string representation/
> > > > choose the list of accepted ports.
> >
> > I wonder if we shouldn't cap the length in order to keep people from
> > playing silly games to DOS the directory system with the likes of
> >
> > accept: 1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,...
>
> Didn't you recently introduce a maximum length for descriptors?
The spec now says to truncate lists at 1000 chars - which is still a
lot.
--
| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `- http://www.debian.org/
More information about the tor-dev
mailing list