Status of Tor proposals and proposal process (March 2008)
nickm at freehaven.net
nickm at freehaven.net
Mon Apr 14 00:00:02 UTC 2008
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 04:08:40PM -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
> Thus spake Nick Mathewson (nickm at freehaven.net):
>
> > 115 Two Hop Paths
> > 116 Two hop paths from entry guards
> >
> > These both are probably dead at this point: there's been no
> > activity for some while. Both have uncertain anonymity
> > implications, especially in light of new path features (like
> > bridges) and possible scalability features arma has in mind.
> > If anybody wants to resurrect them, a first step will be a
> > really thorough analysis of what different attackers can do
> > against them. Marking as DEAD.
>
> Please do not delete these (go ahead and put them in a DEAD directory
> if you would like, though).
Don't worry. Proposals don't get deleted. Look at the "Status" lines
near the heads of the files, and look at 000-index.txt : the only
thing involved in marking proposals as "Dead" is changing their status
to "Dead". For more info, see 001-process.txt .
yrs,
--
Nick
More information about the tor-dev
mailing list