Uptime Sanity Checking

[Nick Mathewson]

On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:47:24AM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> > Ok. I think we're all happy to accept this proposal -- Nick, can
> > you check it into the proposals section and integrate this thread
> > into a 'decisions' section or something?
> 
> In the mean time, I've implemented it:
> http://archives.seul.org/or/cvs/Mar-2007/msg00086.html

Great. I checked in, updated and closed proposal 107 (since you
implemented it and merged it into the spec):

http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/107-uptime-sanity-checking.txt

I also added a new proposal 108 with the MTBF idea:

http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/108-mtbf-based-stability.txt

(It was at
   http://tor.eff.org/svn/trunk/doc/spec/proposals/108-mtbf-based-uptime.txt
for a bit; try that URL if the new one doesn't work yet.)

It's got a couple of implementation/definition questions at the end
that I'm hoping somebody can come up with an answer for.

peace,
-- 
Nick Mathewson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 652 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20070311/b17aa18f/attachment.pgp>