TOR and offensive content

[Aaron Turner]

I'm guessing Jason isn't used to "rabbi's" suggesting that an important
use for anonymity systems is to access pr0n.  Of course, if tor isn't
resistant to an omniprecent and all knowing God, I'm not sure what use
it is in that case anyways. ;-)

-Aaron

On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 04:55:06PM -0800, Len Sassaman wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Jason Holt wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Len Sassaman wrote:
> >
> > > Why would I use TOR if I couldn't access porn?
> >
> > "<rabbi at abditum.com>".  Ah, the irony. :)
> 
> I'm sorry, I don't get your point. What irony?
> 
> (Seriously, porn access is the killer app for anonymity solutions. You
> won't have much of a userbase if you disallow access to "offensive
> content". A major purpose of practical anonymity systems is to allow users
> access to controversial subject matter.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/attachments/20040316/0321d54e/attachment.pgp>