[tor-commits] [tor/master] Add a safe guard to avoid using a zeroed voting schedule
nickm at torproject.org
nickm at torproject.org
Tue Nov 7 19:01:14 UTC 2017
commit e67f4441eb2646368e3e7cb1bcee403667b786f0
Author: David Goulet <dgoulet at torproject.org>
Date: Tue Nov 7 11:14:45 2017 -0500
Add a safe guard to avoid using a zeroed voting schedule
dirvote_get_next_valid_after_time() is the only public function that uses the
voting schedule outside of the dirvote subsystem so if it is zeroed,
recalculate its timing if we can that is if a consensus exists.
Part of #24161
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet at torproject.org>
---
src/or/dirvote.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/or/dirvote.c b/src/or/dirvote.c
index c5ceefecb..33e5ea7d5 100644
--- a/src/or/dirvote.c
+++ b/src/or/dirvote.c
@@ -2859,6 +2859,13 @@ static voting_schedule_t voting_schedule;
time_t
dirvote_get_next_valid_after_time(void)
{
+ /* This is a safe guard in order to make sure that the voting schedule
+ * static object is at least initialized. Using this function with a zeroed
+ * voting schedule can lead to bugs. */
+ if (tor_mem_is_zero((const char *) &voting_schedule,
+ sizeof(voting_schedule))) {
+ dirvote_recalculate_timing(get_options(), time(NULL));
+ }
return voting_schedule.interval_starts;
}
More information about the tor-commits
mailing list