[tor-commits] [tor/maint-0.3.0] Don't expand guard sample set unless consensus is "reasonably live"
nickm at torproject.org
nickm at torproject.org
Thu Jun 22 14:58:25 UTC 2017
commit 32e486de97be6f0267c1318298808488baf6e319
Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm at torproject.org>
Date: Mon Jun 19 15:48:47 2017 -0400
Don't expand guard sample set unless consensus is "reasonably live"
Fixes what I think is the main root cause of 22400. Bugfix on
0.3.0.1-alpha.
---
changes/bug22400_01 | 4 ++++
src/or/entrynodes.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/changes/bug22400_01 b/changes/bug22400_01
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..454c5f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/changes/bug22400_01
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+ o Major bugfixes (entry guards):
+ - When starting with an old consensus, do not add new entry guards
+ unless the consensus is "reasonably live" (under 1 day old). Fixes
+ one root cause of bug 22400; bugfix on 0.3.0.1-alpha.
diff --git a/src/or/entrynodes.c b/src/or/entrynodes.c
index 5b5e13b..34dfdce 100644
--- a/src/or/entrynodes.c
+++ b/src/or/entrynodes.c
@@ -1104,6 +1104,21 @@ entry_guards_expand_sample(guard_selection_t *gs)
{
tor_assert(gs);
const or_options_t *options = get_options();
+
+ if (gs->type != GS_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
+ networkstatus_t *consensus = networkstatus_get_latest_consensus();
+ time_t now = approx_time();
+ if (consensus == NULL) {
+ log_info(LD_GUARD, "Not expanding the sample guard set; we have "
+ "no consensus.");
+ return NULL;
+ } else if (!networkstatus_consensus_reasonably_live(consensus, now)) {
+ log_info(LD_GUARD, "Not expanding the sample guard set; we have "
+ "a consensus, but it is far too old.");
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
int n_sampled = smartlist_len(gs->sampled_entry_guards);
entry_guard_t *added_guard = NULL;
int n_usable_filtered_guards = num_reachable_filtered_guards(gs, NULL);
More information about the tor-commits
mailing list