[tor-commits] [tor/master] Remove XXXXprop271 comments from test_entrynodes.c
nickm at torproject.org
nickm at torproject.org
Mon Jan 30 16:57:44 UTC 2017
commit ed4a3dfef20935e6f357c2881a2db6b2b4445566
Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm at torproject.org>
Date: Mon Jan 30 10:43:53 2017 -0500
Remove XXXXprop271 comments from test_entrynodes.c
These commments were complaints about how I didn't like some aspects
of prop271. They have been superseded by ticket 20832.
---
src/test/test_entrynodes.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/test/test_entrynodes.c b/src/test/test_entrynodes.c
index bcb56e3..249fd1f 100644
--- a/src/test/test_entrynodes.c
+++ b/src/test/test_entrynodes.c
@@ -2044,7 +2044,6 @@ test_entry_guard_select_for_circuit_highlevel_confirm_other(void *arg)
u = entry_guard_succeeded(&guard);
/* We're on the internet (by fiat), so this guard will get called "confirmed"
* and should immediately become primary.
- * XXXX prop271 -- I don't like that behavior, but it's what is specified
*/
tt_int_op(guard->state, OP_EQ, GUARD_CIRC_STATE_COMPLETE);
tt_assert(u == GUARD_USABLE_NOW);
@@ -2338,9 +2337,6 @@ test_entry_guard_upgrade_a_circuit(void *arg)
* primary guards are down, we have two WAITING circuits: one will
* get upgraded to COMPLETED! (The one that started first.)
*/
- /* XXXX prop271 -- perhaps the one that started first should
- * also wind up in confirmed_entry_guards earlier?
- */
smartlist_t *result = smartlist_new();
int r;
More information about the tor-commits
mailing list