[tor-commits] r26173: {website} Dropping project idea item for continuous testing We now hav (website/trunk/getinvolved/en)

[Damian Johnson]

Author: atagar
Date: 2013-04-29 02:23:36 +0000 (Mon, 29 Apr 2013)
New Revision: 26173

Modified:
   website/trunk/getinvolved/en/volunteer.wml
Log:
Dropping project idea item for continuous testing

We now have a spiffy jenkins testing environment and ticket 8261 has been
resolved. Revising the project idea to keep the html output idea but drop
continuous testing.



Modified: website/trunk/getinvolved/en/volunteer.wml
===================================================================
--- website/trunk/getinvolved/en/volunteer.wml	2013-04-28 21:50:53 UTC (rev 26172)
+++ website/trunk/getinvolved/en/volunteer.wml	2013-04-29 02:23:36 UTC (rev 26173)
@@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@
 
     <ol>
       <li>Determine what kind of tests we need. <b>This should be done during the application phase</b> by <a href="https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev/">contacting tor-dev@</a>. Hopefully this will give us an idea of what would be the most useful kind of tests of this nature for Tor development.</li>
-      <li>To be useful our integration tests need to continually run against the present tip of Tor's codebase. To do this we'll want to (1) fetch and compile the latest version of Tor, (2) run our integration tests against it, (3) compose the results as an html formatted email, and send it to a list. (<a href="https://trac.torproject.org/8261">ticket</a>)</li>
+      <li>Our <a href="https://jenkins.torproject.org/job/stem-tor-ci/">automated testing environment</a> presently sends the test output when they fail. We should think about having our tests optionally provide html formatted results (maybe this is something a testing framework can already provide?).</li>
       <li>Implement the new suite of integration tests for Tor. This will likely include expanding Tor to support better testability. One useful candidate, for instance, would be a controller method to fetch our own descriptor. This would let us easily test various configurations to see if they provide valid descriptor content.</li>
     </ol>