[or-cvs] r17772: {tor} so which is it? TIME_MAX or INT_MAX? pick INT_MAX for now. (tor/trunk/src/or)
arma at seul.org
arma at seul.org
Thu Dec 25 15:42:03 UTC 2008
Author: arma
Date: 2008-12-25 10:42:03 -0500 (Thu, 25 Dec 2008)
New Revision: 17772
Modified:
tor/trunk/src/or/directory.c
Log:
so which is it? TIME_MAX or INT_MAX? pick INT_MAX for now.
Modified: tor/trunk/src/or/directory.c
===================================================================
--- tor/trunk/src/or/directory.c 2008-12-25 15:37:47 UTC (rev 17771)
+++ tor/trunk/src/or/directory.c 2008-12-25 15:42:03 UTC (rev 17772)
@@ -3332,20 +3332,20 @@
if (dls->n_download_failures < schedule_len)
increment = schedule[dls->n_download_failures];
else if (dls->n_download_failures == IMPOSSIBLE_TO_DOWNLOAD)
- increment = TIME_MAX;
+ increment = INT_MAX;
else
increment = schedule[schedule_len-1];
if (increment < INT_MAX)
dls->next_attempt_at = now+increment;
else
- dls->next_attempt_at = TIME_MAX;
+ dls->next_attempt_at = INT_MAX;
if (item) {
if (dls->next_attempt_at == 0)
log_debug(LD_DIR, "%s failed %d time(s); I'll try again immediately.",
item, (int)dls->n_download_failures);
- else if (dls->next_attempt_at < TIME_MAX)
+ else if (dls->next_attempt_at < INT_MAX)
log_debug(LD_DIR, "%s failed %d time(s); I'll try again in %d seconds.",
item, (int)dls->n_download_failures,
(int)(dls->next_attempt_at-now));
More information about the tor-commits
mailing list