[or-cvs] r9003: remove a wrong definition of Guard from dir-spec (tor/trunk/doc)
arma at seul.org
arma at seul.org
Tue Nov 28 14:23:07 UTC 2006
Author: arma
Date: 2006-11-28 09:23:03 -0500 (Tue, 28 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 9003
Modified:
tor/trunk/doc/dir-spec.txt
Log:
remove a wrong definition of Guard from dir-spec
Modified: tor/trunk/doc/dir-spec.txt
===================================================================
--- tor/trunk/doc/dir-spec.txt 2006-11-28 13:59:43 UTC (rev 9002)
+++ tor/trunk/doc/dir-spec.txt 2006-11-28 14:23:03 UTC (rev 9003)
@@ -364,7 +364,6 @@
circuits.
"Fast" if the router is suitable for high-bandwidth circuits.
"Guard" if the router is suitable for use as an entry guard.
- (Currently, this means 'fast' and 'stable'.)
"Named" if the router's identity-nickname mapping is canonical,
and this authority binds names.
"Stable" if the router is suitable for long-lived circuits.
@@ -372,9 +371,10 @@
"Valid" if the router has been 'validated'.
"V2Dir" if the router implements this protocol.
- The "r" entry for each router must appear first and is required. The
- "s" entry is optional. Unrecognized flags on the "s" line and extra
- elements on the "r" line must be ignored.
+ The "r" entry for each router must appear first and is required. The
+ "s" entry is optional (see Section 3.1 below for how the flags are
+ decided). Unrecognized flags on the "s" line and extra elements
+ on the "r" line must be ignored.
The signature section contains:
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@
"Stable" -- A router is 'Stable' if its uptime is above median for known
running, valid routers, and it's running a version of Tor not known to
- drop circuits stupidly. (0.1.1.10-alpha throught 0.1.1.16-rc are stupid
+ drop circuits stupidly. (0.1.1.10-alpha through 0.1.1.16-rc are stupid
this way.)
"Fast" -- A router is 'Fast' if its bandwidth is in the top 7/8ths for
More information about the tor-commits
mailing list