[or-cvs] try to make it clearer that eigentrust is one way to do the

[arma at seul.org]

Update of /home2/or/cvsroot/tor/doc
In directory moria:/home/arma/work/onion/cvs/tor/doc

Modified Files:
	incentives.txt 
Log Message:
try to make it clearer that eigentrust is one way to do the
"deputy tester" design, but there are simpler ways too.


Index: incentives.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /home2/or/cvsroot/tor/doc/incentives.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -d -r1.9 -r1.10
--- incentives.txt	9 Mar 2006 22:21:07 -0000	1.9
+++ incentives.txt	25 Mar 2006 22:37:44 -0000	1.10
@@ -51,10 +51,11 @@
    The option above has the directory servers doing all of the
    measurements. This doesn't scale. We can set it up so we have "deputy
    testers" -- trusted other nodes that do performance testing and report
-   their results. If we want to be really adventurous, we could even
+   their results.
+
+   If we want to be really adventurous, we could even
    accept claims from every Tor user and build a complex weighting /
    reputation system to decide which claims are "probably" right.
-
    One possible way to implement the latter is something similar to
    EigenTrust [http://www.stanford.edu/~sdkamvar/papers/eigentrust.pdf],
    where the opinion of nodes with high reputation more is weighted