[tor-bugs] #33045 [Core Tor/Tor]: Increase the number of Tor network relays that support IPv6
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Wed Feb 5 11:05:40 UTC 2020
#33045: Increase the number of Tor network relays that support IPv6
--------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: gaba | Owner: (none)
Type: project | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor: Sponsor55-must
--------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment (by teor):
Replying to [comment:5 gaba]:
> Replying to [comment:3 nusenu]:
> > > By the numbers, about 29% of Tor’s relay bandwidth supports IPv6--
but functionally, only 20% of Tor’s available bandwidth supports IPv6.
> >
> > These numbers seem outdated.
> >
> > onionoo data from 2020-01-24 23:00 UTC:
> >
> > What cw fraction / guard/middle/exit probability has an IPv6 ORPort?
> > CW Fraction: 31.83%
> > Guard: 29.06%
> > Middle: 29.79%
> > Exit: 39.24%
> > Relays count: 1210
> >
> > daily updated onionoo based IPv6 stats:
https://nusenu.github.io/OrNetStats/#ipv6-relay-stats
> >
> > IPv6 related metrics graph:
> > https://metrics.torproject.org/relays-ipv6.html
>
> Thanks! Those numbers were from when we wrote the project last year.
nusenu, you're also using some different calculations from the grant:
* you're calculating Guard IPv6 consensus weight fraction
* the grant uses Guard-but-not-Exit IPv6 consensus weight fraction
Since exit bandwidth is scarce in the tor network, tor clients use Guard-
Exits as Exits. Therefore, to support IPv6 clients, we need to increase
Guard-but-not-Exit IPv6 consensus weight.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/33045#comment:7>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list