[tor-bugs] #30255 [Core Tor/sbws]: Add additional bandwidth file headers in sbws 1.2
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Fri Apr 26 19:07:34 UTC 2019
#30255: Add additional bandwidth file headers in sbws 1.2
---------------------------+-----------------------------------
Reporter: teor | Owner: (none)
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone: sbws: 1.2.x-final
Component: Core Tor/sbws | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
---------------------------+-----------------------------------
Comment (by juga):
Replying to [comment:5 karsten]:
> irl and I discussed the topic of additional bandwidth headers as part of
#30216, where we're trying to write a parser for these files.
i'm unfamiliar with metrics ecosystem and i thought that implementing the
parser in stem (#29056, #30160) would avoid you to re-implementing for
metrics. Is there a way to avoid that?.
> When reading this ticket and its subtickets I'm slightly concerned that
you might consider adding spaces to new header lines.
No, we should not add spaces. I made the mistake of writing the url of a
wip branch in a ticket that should not have been reviewed yet.
> For example, operating system and contact information sound like they
might contain spaces.
For the operating system, this is what the command suggested by teor would
generate: `Linux-4.9.0-8-amd64-x86_64-with-glibc2.7`. It doesn't contain
space.
For the contact information, teor said:
> Let's not specify another unstructured contact string, please.
And imo, it should just be an email address, if we add contact
information.
But as far as I see it, that means trouble! One reason is that `bandwidth-
file-headers` in dir-spec doesn't permit spaces in `KeyValue` parts, so
that it wouldn't be possible to copy over header lines to the vote.
>
> Does this make sense?
Yes
> In fact, if it does, would you mind clarifying in the spec that header
lines always have the format `HeaderLine ::= KeyValue NL`? That would also
simplify the parser, because we'd then be able to distinguish header and
relay lines by the number of space-separated `KeyValue` elements.
Hmm, that makes sense, but it's not true for the first line `Timestamp
NL`. Maybe we can just clarify that.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30255#comment:7>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list