[tor-bugs] #29897 [Core Tor/Tor]: Refactor handle_get_next_bandwidth() to use connection_dir_buf_add()
    Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
    blackhole at torproject.org
       
    Thu Apr  4 00:13:29 UTC 2019
    
    
  
#29897: Refactor handle_get_next_bandwidth() to use connection_dir_buf_add()
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
 Reporter:  teor                                 |          Owner:  teor
     Type:  defect                               |         Status:  closed
 Priority:  Medium                               |      Milestone:  Tor:
                                                 |  0.4.0.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/Tor                         |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal                               |     Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:  consider-backport-after-authority-   |  Actual Points:  0.1
  test, consider-backport-after-040-stable,      |
  tor-dirauth, metrics-needs, tor-bwauth,        |
  035-removed-20180711, 040-roadmap-proposed,    |
  040-backport                                   |
Parent ID:  #21377                               |         Points:  0.1
 Reviewer:  nickm                                |        Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by teor):
 * status:  merge_ready => closed
 * keywords:
     consider-backport-after-authority-test, consider-backport-
     after-040-stable, tor-dirauth, metrics-needs, tor-bwauth,
     035-removed-20180711, 040-roadmap-proposed, 035-backport-maybe-
     in-21377, 040-backport
     =>
     consider-backport-after-authority-test, consider-backport-
     after-040-stable, tor-dirauth, metrics-needs, tor-bwauth,
     035-removed-20180711, 040-roadmap-proposed, 040-backport
 * resolution:   => fixed
 * milestone:  Tor: 0.3.5.x-final => Tor: 0.4.0.x-final
Comment:
 Replying to [comment:7 nickm]:
 > PR 867 looks okay -- I'm assuming that's what I'm supposed to review
 here?  Please let me know if I reviewed the wrong thing.
 >
 > Before we backport it, though, let's talk briefly about why we're doing
 this.  We usually don't backport refactoring stuff.
 You're right, the code should be equivalent, so we don't need to backport
 it.
 I felt a little uncomfortable having different code in a bunch of
 different releases. But I don't think we can avoid that problem, because
 backporting refactoring is higher-risk than letting code diverge.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29897#comment:10>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
    
    
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list