[tor-bugs] #24977 [Core Tor/Tor]: Non-fatal assertion !(tor_mem_is_zero((const char*)node->hsdir_index->fetch, DIGEST256_LEN))
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki
blackhole at torproject.org
Fri Jun 8 13:02:09 UTC 2018
#24977: Non-fatal assertion !(tor_mem_is_zero((const
char*)node->hsdir_index->fetch, DIGEST256_LEN))
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: asn | Owner: asn
Type: defect | Status:
| merge_ready
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.3.4.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version: Tor:
| 0.3.2.1-alpha
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: tor-hs, prop224, | Actual Points:
034-triage-20180328, 034-removed-20180502 |
Parent ID: | Points: 1
Reviewer: dgoulet | Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by dgoulet):
Replying to [comment:24 asn]:
> Hm, I guess the HS-client example above is indeed a plausible (but
unlikely) edge-case. It's worth noting that the example you cited above
applies only to the HS client case, whereas I think we covered it for HS
services since services basically function based on those callbacks. Of
course, there might be other cases around the codebase, which we are not
aware of right now ("if a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to
hear it...").
Yes my worry is mostly about other possible issues this affect. And making
it a special case for the hs service callback to recalculate seems the
wrong approach...
> a) Fix all the cases by recomputing data immediately when a clock jump
is noticed (as per my first branch). This has the negative effect of
giving variable time duration to the callback as Nick pointed out.
> b) Fix the HS client edge-case dgoulet pointed out, by calling
`recalculate_consensus_data_callback()` when an HS client tries to connect
to an HS.
> c) Merge Nick's branch and leave the edge-cases open. In the future, we
can fix those too as we understand more things about this problem.
> d) Do more research, try to understand the problem more, and figure out
an even better solution if possible...
Not the easiest call here but I think (a) is what needs to be done even
though I don't like much doing extra work in the update time
callback.......
The reason is that (b) is *one* possible issue among possibly other.
Special cases where we directly call the callback makes me think we are
piling up on the house of cards. The problem with (c) now is that this
issue is something that took us quite a bit of time to finally find and I
bet if something outside of the HS subsystem is affected by this, it will
be hard as well to find out. And (d), I doubt it is needed, we have a good
grasp on the problem imo.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/24977#comment:25>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
More information about the tor-bugs
mailing list